Sunday, January 12, 2025

“The Face and the Voice of God”

Pope Francis baptized 21 children in the Sistine Chapel this morning (image from Vatican Media livestream) during the celebration of today’s Mass for the Solemnity of Jesus’s Baptism—His encounter with John the Baptist in the Jordan River, where the mystery of God as Trinity was “manifested”—thus bringing to a conclusion this “Season of Epiphanies” that began on Christmas Day. At noon, the Pope gave this brief reflection and exhortation at the Angelus:

“When Jesus receives baptism, the Spirit manifests Himself and the Epiphany of God occurs; He reveals His face in the Son and makes His voice heard, which says: ‘You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased’ (v. 22). The face and the voice.

“First of all, the face. In revealing Himself to be the Father through the Son, God establishes a special space for entering into dialogue and communion with humanity. It is the face of the beloved Son.

“In second place, the voice. Face and voice. ‘You are my beloved Son’ (v. 22). This is another sign that accompanies the revelation of Jesus.

“Dear brothers and sisters, today’s feast makes us contemplate the face and the voice of God, which are manifested in Jesus’ humanity. And so, let us ask ourselves: do we feel loved? Do I feel loved and accompanied by God, or do I think that God is distant from me? Are we capable of recognizing His face in Jesus and in our brothers and sisters? And are we accustomed to listening to His voice?

“I will ask you a question: does every one of you remember the date of your Baptism? This is very important! Think: on what day was I baptized? And if we do not remember, when we arrive home, let us ask our parents or our godparents the date of our Baptism. And let us celebrate this date as if it were a new birthday: that of our birth in the Spirit of God. Do not forget! This is our homework: the date of our Baptism. Let us entrust ourselves to the Virgin Mary, invoking Her help. And do not forget the date of your Baptism!”

My own Baptism was on March 10, 1963. I don’t always remember or celebrate this day, but I shall during this Holy Year. I shall remember and celebrate it with gratitude as the beginning of my own journey in Christ toward the definitive embrace of the Triune God.

Saturday, January 11, 2025

The Prayers of “Epiphany Week”

Above: a reflection from the late Pope Benedict XVI on the wonderful mystery we have celebrated in this season, and at the beginning of the Holy Year 2025.

——————————————

During this past week, I’ve been digitally “clipping” some of the beautiful and profound invocations, antiphons, and prayers of these days leading up to tomorrow’s great feast. Here are precious prayers encompassing the themes of the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word—the Only-Begotten Son of the Father—and the centrality of this event for our destiny, for the whole world, for all of creation.









Friday, January 10, 2025

“Remembering Christina Grimmie” in Digital Portraits

This date marks eight years and seven months since the tragic (and, in my opinion, heroic) death of Christina Grimmie. These four portraits are “works in progress,” I suppose. They have their origin in screenshots I took from Christina’s YouTube channel, but they have been imaginatively reconceived in many ways (using various tools of digital media).

Graphics media continue to explode with dizzying new possibilities (too many!). I have been working with crafting photographs into “digital art” since 2013. I don’t understand the technological manipulations that make this work possible (anymore than I understand the science behind photography). The introduction and increase of so-called “artificial intelligence” into graphics widens the scope of what can be done with existing images, but still in the manner of a blunt hammer that opens up paths to pursue but also creates new problems. I have little use for the currently trendy “word-to-image” gimmicks, which don’t work for my purposes except insofar as they facilitate some small corrections.

My experience remains that of an photographic artist, who works with new tools that expand the plasticity of photo images so that they can be “sculpted” in ways that correspond to the inspiration and “intuition” that guides what I’m trying to do. Digital tools offer powerful “preset physical alterations" than can contribute further material for this creative inspiration and suggest wider paths for the artist's work. But these same tools (so "easy" to apply) can often deflect the artist's attention away from the personal trajectory of his or her properly aesthetic inspiration, and “take over” the unfolding of the work—distracting the creative process and resulting in a sculpted image that is not only mediocre but also dissatisfying and frustrating to the artist.

The digital world is hyper-saturated with images, and with tools that promise to produce more images quickly and easily. Lots of this involves simple image-making for illustrative or functional purposes (and there's nothing wrong with that). Too many "creative images," however, are pretentious, strange, flippant, inconsiderately fantastic-for-its-own-sake, cheap and homogenized, ugly, or violent. I have made more than my share of cheap stuff Nevertheless I'm betting that a new art form may be emerging from all this chaotic visual experimentation. In time it will find its own aesthetic measure. Perhaps this art form is a kind of extension of photography, which was struggling to find its own proper creative possibilities a century ago. Later on, cinema and television would develop and fight for recognition in analogous ways under the condescending and skeptical eyes of dramatic artists who used “traditional [stage] media.” Improvisational music also struggled—first as the misunderstood marvel of jazz, and then with the addition of electronic amplification and tonal manipulation, the “popular music” that is heard everywhere today, most of which is banal and forgettable, but which occasionally is borne up to astonishing heights of beauty (analogously) by extraordinary, gifted, and hard-working musical artists.

Christina Grimmie was one of those artists (and many other things too, which I have discussed at considerable length on this blog over the past eight years).

Critics raise legitimate and important points, but they must be not simply dismissive but also attentive. The realm of beauty is as extensive and analogous as the realm of being itself. Artistic creativity is a human activity, which requires more than just the happy accidents of algorithmic associations. It requires a person who uses these resources to craft an object that “incarnates” a real creative intuition of the luminosity of being (and digital bytes are material, for all their complexity, so they can ultimately be crafted into a material thing under the vision and intention of the artist).

I may never rise above the level of mediocrity, but I am trying. I have spent many hours, much laborious attention, and a decisive amount of “hands-on” work on my digital landscapes (from my own photographs) and—more recently—on portraiture that concentrates on a handful of frequently photographed and interesting faces of celebrities that I have some sort of connection with (because portraiture that arises from insight into the beauty of a person has a higher and more sustaining “aim” for the artist). 

Sometimes, a portrait veers off the features of the original model and becomes a “different face” and I think that can be very interesting too. But I begin with a few familiar faces. I have worked on Lionel Messi’s odd-shaped, funny, generous face. He remains my favorite soccer player, and my second-favorite famous Argentinian person. (Ha, ha!) I was so glad that Messi finally won the World Cup. He has proven that great personal athletic talent and ardent teamwork are two sides of the same coin. He is intense and spontaneous, and also has huge ears that add “color” to his expressions of determination and joy. Then, of course, there’s the inimitable Avril Lavigne, with twenty three years of faces from ages 17-40 — Avril’s millennium generational “iconic” face, an exquisite face full of a multitude of often hilarious expressions, volumes of hair in various colors, and always the “overdone” black eyeliner. Efforts to do portraits of her are quite challenging (and rarely successful), but as I’ve expressed elsewhere on this blog, I have reason to care about her—the Lyme disease odyssey, her big (albeit wild) heart, and the touch of greatness in that magnificent first album and in some of her subsequent work. Avril can be crazy but she’s also shown lots of resilience in facing illness and other difficulties. I appreciate her and I pray for her. I also work on Ed Sheeran, who has a big, open, endearingly “ugly” face of an English pub bloke, topped off with various funky hairstyles. Nothing about his face suggests that he has been at or near the top of the charts for over a decade. He is super-talented, of course. I’m not particularly a fan of his music, but I know that—with all the fame—he’s had a hard road, and he’s very open about his struggles to develop his musical craft. I pray for him too. Another face is that of Norwegian singer-songwriter Sigrid Raabe (“Sigrid”), who makes great Scandipop music, has lots of informal pics and videos on her social media, usually wears very little makeup, and has a classic cheerful Norwegian face with fair skin and a big smile with an endearingly distinctive slightly-crooked front tooth. She’s has a natural bearing and seems like a lovely, unpretentious yet confident person. And, like most Scandinavian pop artists, Sigrid is classically trained on the piano and has serious musicals chops that undergird her well-crafted electronic pop songs.

There are some others "models" too, as well as a few “original” faces that I have developed over the years, and—of course—my own goofy mug as the subject of the most outrageous experiments in self-portraiture and caricature. Anyway, you get the idea. My portrait efforts focus on human heads and faces, which are inexhaustibly fascinating if one pays attention to them. Usually they include shoulders and some of the upper body simply attired with something like a tee shirt, so that the emphasis remains on faces and facial expressions, ears and hair. I have literally thousands of "drafts" that I keep in my "digital notebooks," some of which I revisit from time to time. They represent my efforts to work up visual ideas within a wildly expanding medium. They are the fruit of experiments and repetitions that may eventually lead to something I regard as finished, but more often are practical exercises engaged in for learning purposes. Very occasionally, I share on this blog a portrait I consider to be "finished," if particular circumstances warrant it. But I post my "best effort" portraits of Christina more frequently as part of my endeavor to remember her unique history and ongoing legacy every month (I think Christina would encourage me to risk a limited viewing of the artistic process that she has inspired me to take up, especially with respect to her own face that is no longer seen alive in this world). 

I realize the delicacy and particular responsibility this work entails (notwithstanding the fact that faces seem to mean nothing the more they are ubiquitously represented in the multimedia world). These faces I work with are the faces of persons, and their inner qualities—the more-than-meets-the-eye facets of personality revealed in their faces—stir up my vision and motivation to “present them” afresh, even if it's only a kind of "practice" for myself in this new emerging craft.

I’ve already written so much about why the late great Christina Grimmie is my chief inspiration and “muse” in this artistic adventure. She had a strength and beauty of soul, a light that shined from the inside outwards to generate a welcoming environment for others. In her art and in her life, she was courageous, willing to take risks not recklessly but boldly in the service of love. She shed light on the path of how to live in the world of today, how to surrender one’s self to the will of Christ in everything—including her presence in the Hollywood celebrity world—and how to die ...with arms wide open, in utter vulnerability, welcoming a stranger at an open meet-and-greet (because Christina wanted to meet everyone).

I have much to learn from her example. Meanwhile, I’m not afraid to risk pushing forward a little in the uncharted territory of digital art. That’s what she would want me to do. I may never get it “right,” but I will struggle to do my best.

Thursday, January 9, 2025

“Impressions of Snow” (January 2025)

From the “Virtual Art Gallery” of JJStudios, we present these visual meditations on the recent (relatively mild) snow as experienced by JJ in his part of the Shenandoah Valley. People north and south of us, or at higher altitudes, may have had a more dramatic and voluminous snow experience in these early days of January 2025.

The first image is entitled “Waiting for Snow,” while the others form a series of “Impressions of Snow” (1, 2, and 3). They have been posted elsewhere, but here we can gather them in one place:

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

He Loved Us and Sent His Son

"Let us love one another, because love is of God; everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God. Whoever is without love does not know God, for God is love. In this way the love of God was revealed to us: God sent his only-begotten Son into the world so that we might have life through him. In this is love: not that we have loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as expiation for our sins"
(1 John 4:7-10).

Monday, January 6, 2025

Happy Epiphany, and Happy Epiphany WEEK!

Happy Epiphany WEEK! Beautiful prayers as the liturgical Christmas Season continues until next Sunday. God the Word “appeared among us as the splendor of truth” by sharing “the frailty of our flesh.”⭐️ 

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Another “New Year” For Me

Since I was a little boy, I have noticed that the celebration of the beginning of each new year has also involved celebrating the beginning of a “new year” in my own life. January 2 is JJ’s own “New Years Day,” and there have been quite a few of these. I have just marked the 23rd anniversary of my 39th birthday!

Ha ha ha…😜

62 years is a good stretch of time. It puts many things into perspective, but I'm not going to philosophize about them today. The most important thing I can say is that I thank God for everything.

We had a lovely day with family and friends. I got a very much needed haircut and beard trim from my favorite barber: my wife. I went for a walk in the cold clear air with Maria and Anna. We will have a bit more of a party over the weekend.

I’ll just post a collection of pictures, some old and some new, that cover various points of time and memory over these 6+ decades.

Anna looks like she’s ready to walk in space!☺️
Maria bundles up in her favorite pink coat.
Sisters! (Granddaughters!)
Here are the current “Elders” of the Virginia Janaro Clan.
Me and Eileen, a.k.a. “Dad and Mom,” “Papa and Nana”… (recent pic)
Eileen and I as Bride and Groom, nearly 29 years ago. Just two crazy kids!
Take it back 20 years ago: Spring 2005.
Janaro family, Fall 2005. Struggling with my health back then.
Me with Cardinal Arinze at a conference at my university (2004, I was Dept. Chair).
2006 brought me (what turned out to be temporary) remission, and Premie Josefina.
Above is me with Irish Dancing Josefina, around 2021 or 2022ish. 
Vigorous and healthy me with John Paul and Agnese, Fall 1999.
Me performing on guitar, 1980s (yes, that’s REALLY me!)
Approaching Manhattan on the Ferry, 1983 (when I had HAIR!😜)
JJ as irresponsible teenager (late 70s - early 80s)
Young rockstar-wannabe JJ “shredding” a solo (I was pretty good, actually).
Me with my Dad at a baseball game, 1977-ish.
The Janaro family on Christmas. (Mid 1970s?)
Back to 1964: My Dad and Mom with a one-year-old me.

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

World Day of Peace 2025

New Years Day on the liturgical calendar of the current Roman Rite is not only the Octave of Christmas (Merry Christmas Day Eight!) and the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God (that singular collaborator in the Mystery of the Nativity of Christ); it has also been designated (since 1968) as the World Day of Peace. Every year since 1968, the Popes have issued “Messages” to the Church and the world for this day, encouraging us to pray and work for true peace—peace in our hearts and peace in the world. Pope Francis gives us a great challenge for this new year, to seek peace under the light of the Prince of Peace, through justice, dialogue, works of mercy, and solidarity (read the entire text here).

May 2025 be a year in which peace flourishes! A true and lasting peace that goes beyond quibbling over the details of agreements and human compromises. May we seek the true peace that is granted by God to hearts disarmed: hearts not set on calculating what is mine and what is yours; hearts that turn selfishness into readiness to reach out to others; hearts that see themselves as indebted to God and thus prepared to forgive the debts that oppress others; hearts that replace anxiety about the future with the hope that every individual can be a resource for the building of a better world” (Pope Francis, “Message” 13).

When Francis, like his predecessors, speaks of “building…a better world,” he is not referring to a vague secularist humanitarianism, but to the work of fraternal charity, the work of hearts that communicate the integral love of the Heart of Jesus for human persons, communities, societies, and nations, the collaboration with Jesus in spreading the first fruits—the “foretaste”—of His Father’s Kingdom wherein we are destined to share His glory, and be definitively fulfilled as His brothers and sisters, and therefore brothers and sisters of one another. The Pope addresses the whole world because he knows that whoever seeks true peace—in justice, mercy, freedom, love, and solidarity—seeks God’s Kingdom whether they are explicitly aware of it or not.

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

The End and the Beginning...

We have arrived at the end of the year 2024, which—even as I write these words—has already changed to the beginning of 2025 in many parts of the world. Global celebrations with parties, fireworks, and food and drink have long marked the end of December and the beginning of January as a "new year" with a new number to designate it.

From ordinary people to news and entertainment media, it is customary to "look back" on the year that has passed, and remark on its significant moments regarding births and deaths, engagements, marriages, achievements, failures, tragedies, wars and treaties of peace, political elections, regime changes, news of [and gossip about] celebrities or other prominent personalities, the top movies and videos, the top songs in popular music, foods, weather, fads, stock-markets, sports champions, "annual" statistics of every imaginable kind, etc., etc. And, of course, all sorts of “projections” for what might happen in the new year. Then, at midnight, people attending parties and celebrations feel that they have "changed"—that they have now been "clothed" with a new year of possibilities, a chance for a new life (or at least a better life) which prompts them to make "resolutions," most of which are forgotten in a few weeks.

Most of these secular traditions have not varied much since I was a boy in the late-1960s-early-1970s. But there are many differences too. I recall being with parents and grandparents, crowding around a twenty-inch screen on a black-and-white television watching Guy Lombardo and his Orchestra play fancy music while "everyone" at Times Square in New York City, watching on TV, and—basically—the WHOLE WORLD waited for famous "ball" to drop and officially declare the beginning of January 1, 1970 or whatever the new number was. 

The year 1970 sticks in my mind from childhood. I was an unusually curious and bright first-grader who learned a few things about "decades" and became fascinated with the idea that "we are entering a new decade!" It felt so expansive, so full of possibilities, this new decade that began in 1970.

That was 55 years ago.

How did we get these day and weeks, months and years? Well, there are of course many different calendars and calendar systems which people still follow in many parts of the world, that belong to their religious and cultural heritage. But the “Global Village” in its interactions and its doing-business (if nothing else) uses a common annual calendar which grew from ancient Roman civilization. The names of the months are Latin-based, indicating gods or numerical points: thus “January” is for “Janus,” who stood for the “gateway” to the new year, while “December” indicated the “tenth” month, which it actually was in the early Roman Republican 10 month calendar (notice that in current usage these “numerical months”  are all “off” by a deficit of two). At some point in the Roman Republican period, the first two months of January and February were added on at the beginning. It was a solar calendar, so the effort was made to correspond to the solstices and—Rome being in the temperate zone—the patterns of the seasons which were important to agricultural societies. Calendars were fine-tuned, days added, in order to keep aligned with the changes in the relationship between earth and sun.

The Romans were good mathematicians, calculating that what we now refer to as a “trip around the sun” took 365 days and a bit less than six further hours. And it was Julius Caesar (who saw himself as a consolidator of the Roman world) who instituted the “Julian Calendar,” which cleverly established the “leap day” once every four years to make up for the accumulations of extra hours at the end of each year. The Julian Calendar is almost the same as today’s common calendar. A solar year is actually 365. 2425 days. It wasn’t unreasonable for the Romans to think that rounding it up to a quarter of a day was “close enough.” They probably never dreamed that the same calendar would still be in use 1500 years later. By then, the Caesarian glitch of putting a little too much “leap” into the quadrennial Leap Year has resulted in a calendar that was 10 days ahead of the actual annual trip around the sun. 

So the math experts came up with a better arrangement for the future by skipping certain leap years (math nerds can look up the details) to bring the recorded year closer to the solar year. This was also important for the Church’s calculation of movable feasts, above all Easter, which was always celebrated on the first Sunday after the first full moon on or after the spring equinox, which was designated for March 21. In 1582, another Roman—Pope Gregory XIII—established the official new calendar by instituting the changes and by subtracting ten days from the month of October of 1582 (just for that year, to put the calendar back “in sync”—thus October 4, 1582 was followed the next day by October 15, 1582). Catholic countries switched to the “Gregorian” calendar first, but eventually all Western countries adopted it as the common calendar.

Then, in the 19th century, the West spread its civil and economic institutions by way of its colonial system all over the face of the earth. These proud “world powers” proceeded in the 20th century to fight a horrible war against one another, then another horrible war with more countries, from which emerged a global standoff that almost literally set the entire world on fire. But people also discovered amazing medical interventions, technologies of all kinds, antibiotics, sanitation, water purification, indoor flush toilets, unprecedentedly rapid modes of transportation, electricity, radio, television, computers, the internet. We also learned from some of our most destructive mistakes (while at the same time inventing new mistakes). The past century-and-a-quarter has been quite a ride. The 20th century in which I was born is loaded with years that are associated with historical events and changes of gigantic significance: 1914, 1917, 1939, 1945, 1948, 1949, 1956, 1968 (oh boy, 1968), 1989 … and it has continued into the 21st century with 2001 [as in September 11], and—alas, I fear the future may regard it as such—2022 (the beginning of a War that is now being fought in Ukraine but may yet flare up [or pause for a “peace deal,” smolder for a few years, and then explode] all over the Global Village in ways we can hardly imagine).

For billions of people, this is not their “primary” calendar and it does not mark today as the eve of the New Year. The Islamic World has a different calendar (though they also use the common calendar for secular and globally interactive purposes). The Chinese “officially” use the Western calendar, but the ancient popular Chinese lunar calendar with its Chinese zodiac is still a strong cultural reference point for a billion and a half Chinese. All these diverse calendars, with their embedded historical traditions and peculiar variations, are fascinating. Still, in the big transportation-communications-hypernetworked world—the world where people travel and buy and sell and trade, or wish they could—tonight is New Years Eve 2024. 

In the 21st century, "New Years Eve" has become (if one wants it to be) an day-long, live-streaming virtual event, where one can "pop in" on many of the large outdoor gatherings in famous cities all over the world and watch countdowns-to-midnight, celebrations, and huge fireworks displays as it “becomes 2025” as much as 16 hours earlier than in New York City, U.S.A. At 8:00 AM this morning, Sydney, Australia was ringing in 2025 with its world-renowned fireworks over Port Jackson Bay. Soon come Tokyo, Taipei, Hong Kong, Mumbai, the Gulf States, Europe with Rome and Paris, then London (where suburban Greenwich still hosts the world’s “official” 0:00 hours clock that sets the standard for the rest of the world). As I write in this moment, 2025 is passing over the Atlantic, so there’s been a bit of a lull on human celebrations, but Brazil is on the horizon: 8 minutes to 2025 for Rio and Sao Paolo.

It is (or will be) 2025 in all those places by the time New York drops the ball in Times Square.

So why do I ramble about all this? The calendar and the years that pass are meaningful for history, for the past, present, and future. They mark the steps of a journey that the whole world now consciously takes at least in a material sense. But why these numbers of this “Roman” Western calendar? The original Roman Calendar (Caesar’s calendar) had “Year One” set at the foundation of Rome 700 years prior to Caesar. Other calendars have other “origin dates.” It’s interesting that what is called the “Common Era” (C.E.) has the number 2025 for the new year. Also, this is the only calendar that counts from the center of time rather than a fundamental beginning. Before the Year One “C.E.” the numbers go backwards: One B.C.E. (Before Common Era), with the previous years denominated 2 B.C.E., 3 B.C.E., etc. Do people throughout the world who use this calendar ever wonder what’s so special about the Year One C.E.? What happened during this seemingly unremarkable year that inaugurated the “Common Era”? What was so important about that year that the prior years counted down to it, and subsequent years continue to be counted up from it

We are about to record the beginning of 2025, which means that we are marking (maybe not strictly mathematically, but in a numerically approximate and existentially symbolic manner) the passage of two thousand and twenty five years since… what

When I was young everyone was still using A.D. and B.C (“Anno Domini” and “Before Christ” or the equivalent phrase and, if necessary, initials), whereas now these have fallen out of secular usage. Of course, Christians have long concluded by historical indicators that Jesus was probably born around 4 B.C. and that December 25 is a liturgical date rather than a verifiable birthday. So, the numerical precision of the “common calendar” is a “little off” (this is not unusual in calendar systems, as we have seen).  Still, the symbolic reference of the number remains the birth of Jesus Christ

This means that whatever we call it, for whatever reason, whenever we say “Happy New Year” we are acknowledging (even if only remotely and implicitly) that the very measuring of time within history is marked according to the central event that gives meaning to the whole of history: God coming among us in the flesh, entering our history, dwelling with us.

After nearly 62 years of this life, I continue to see more and more why the years are aptly marked in this way. It still matters. It always matters.

Merry Christmas Octave! And Happy New Year…

Sunday, December 29, 2024

The “Holy Family” and the Christmas Octave

Happy Feast of the Holy Family! Today is the "Fifth Day of Christmas" within the ChristmasOctave. Like Easter, "Christmas Day" is eight days long, a celebration that brings each year to an end and begins the next. 

We continue to rejoice in the Birth of Jesus during these days and beyond. The glory of God's infinite merciful love is made manifest in the birth of this Child, the Word made flesh who has come to redeem and transform us. 

May the light of Christmas continue to shine in our hearts and sustain us in whatever circumstances we face. Jesus has come to be with us!

Thursday, December 26, 2024

Merry Christmas 2024!

We don’t have any “whole family” pictures this Christmas, although we have all been able spend time together during the past two days. The “Christmas Season” has just begun for us, in any case. It’s nice  to have “little kids” around again for the holidays. Maria has had lots of fun with presents this year, and food too. Anna is still at that age where she has more fun playing with the wrapping paper than with presents.😉





Christ is Born! These are precious days in the liturgical year—days that are “always new” because the manifestation of the glory of God’s love in the Child Jesus is an inexhaustible event.  God has drawn close to us, irrevocably. He informs all of our colorful, earthy (even kitsch-y) Christmas traditions of color and lights, cookies and sweets, presents and “good cheer” (which endeavors to visit us a little even in the midst of burdens and suffering); He brings His goodness into the smallness of our human ways.

The “Baby Jesus” statue under our tree is the same one as our kids used to hold for pictures when they were little. The collage below the current picture of the baby Jesus takes us back to Christmas 2005, almost 20 years ago, with John Paul, Agnese, Lucia, and Teresa as little kids. Jojo is not there because she didn’t exist yet. The miracle of Josefina was still in the future, as were many other “miracles”—a hundredfold of gifts were yet to come (as was no small amount of suffering).

The statue of the Baby Jesus is a sign of the greatest gift, the all-encompassing gift of God’s redeeming love. The gift of His merciful love endures forever. And the statue has endured (with only one major repair job) through the years of our family history.